Engineering explained · YIELD

A great yield.
A terrible business?

The difference between yield, atom economy and cost per kilogram, with the ibuprofen comparison and a worked cost example.

Working in Aspen Plus? Try Reflux Student free →

Reflux builds and runs a two-stage condensate stabiliser in Aspen Plus, from one sentence.

Out now

Try Reflux Student free on Aspen Plus

Reflux Student drives your own Aspen Plus V14 from plain English. You type what you want, it opens the case, makes the change in Aspen, runs it, reads the result back and tells you what it verified. Aspen does the math. You keep the judgment. Windows, your own licence, and free to start is a trial with a limit on it, not a free product.

Try it free on Aspen Plus →

Enter your email on the next page and the download link lands in your inbox, so you can open it on the Windows machine Aspen lives on. Windows will say it does not recognise the app the first time: click More info, then Run anyway. The certificate is new and Windows trusts it by reputation, which takes downloads to build. Nothing is wrong with the file.

Not on Aspen Plus? Tell me which simulator you use → and you hear the day your build exists.

01 / YIELD

A high yield is not a cost model.

A route can convert most of its limiting reactant and still consume expensive inputs or create a difficult separation. Three different questions need three different measures:

Yield
How much desired product did you isolate compared with the theoretical amount from the limiting reactant?
Atom economy
What fraction of the mass of the stoichiometric reactants could end up in the desired product? It is a theoretical reaction metric, not a measure of conversion. Solvents and catalysts are not counted unless they are consumed stoichiometrically.
Cost per kilogram
What did the inputs and the rest of the process cost for each kilogram of saleable product?

Definitions: ACS, atom economy and green chemistry metrics.

02 / CASE

Ibuprofen: fewer steps, more atoms used.

The EPA’s account of the BHC ibuprofen process compares six stoichiometric steps with three catalytic steps. Its reported atom-utilisation numbers make the difference concrete:

EPA’s comparison of the older and BHC processes
MeasureOlder routeBHC route
Steps63
Atom utilisation<40%About 80%
Including recovered acetic acidNot statedVirtually 99%

The near-99% figure includes a recovered byproduct. It is not a 99% isolated yield of ibuprofen. On a simplified 100 kg stoichiometric-reactant basis, 40% and 80% correspond to 40 kg and 80 kg allocated to desired product theoretically. They are not measured plant yields or complete material balances.

The EPA also reports a large reduction in aqueous salt waste. Fewer steps and better material use can improve a route, but this source does not provide a comparative dollars-per-kilogram cost model.

Source: US EPA, 1997 Greener Synthetic Pathways Award: BHC ibuprofen process.

03 / COST

The line a yield percentage cannot give you.

Raw-material cost / kg product
= Σ (kg of purchased input / kg product × price / kg input)

Here is an explicitly hypothetical one-input comparison. Assume each route needs 1 kg of its priced feed per theoretical kilogram of product, with no feed recovery. Different stoichiometry would change that basis.

Illustrative numbers only, not ibuprofen plant costs
QuantityRoute ARoute B
Isolated yield95%80%
Feed price$2,000 / kg$20 / kg
Feed per kg product1 / 0.95 = 1.053 kg1 / 0.80 = 1.250 kg
Feed cost per kg product$2,105.26$25.00

The higher-yield route loses this particular raw-material comparison. That does not mean high yield is bad. It means yield cannot answer a price question on its own.

For a real route, sum every purchased input and account consistently for recovery or recycle. Then add solvent losses, separation duties, utilities, waste treatment, labour, quality requirements and capital. Keep atom economy separate from process mass intensity, which includes the broader material inputs.

The chemistry is only part of the process.

Reflux Student works with Aspen Plus on Windows, and it is free to start. Not on Aspen Plus? Tell us which simulator you use and you hear the day your build exists.

Try it free on Aspen Plus →

Nathan Ruberto · Co‑Founder, CEO

Back to reflux.sh →